Rep. Zach Fansler, D-Bethel, addresses the Capitol Press Corps in March 2017. Fansler is facing calls for him to resign from both caucuses after a woman alleged he assaulted her. (Photo by Skip Gray/360 North)The fallout from the assault allegations against Bethel Democratic Rep. Zach Fansler continued Monday, with members from both parties calling for him to resign.Listen nowFansler didn’t show up in the Capitol on the first weekday since the Juneau Empire reported that Juneau police and the Department of Law were investigating him.The Juneau Empire reported Fansler was drunk and slapped a woman repeatedly, rupturing her eardrum, when she denied his sexual advances.Anchorage Democratic Rep. Ivy Spohnholz said Fansler can’t adequately represent his constituents at this point.“I join House majority coalition leadership in calling for Representative Fansler’s resignation,” Spohnholz said. “I think that as leaders, we are called to a higher standard — the highest standard – of behavior, ethical and moral.”The House majority caucus is scheduled to meet Monday evening.It will be the first caucus meeting since the allegations became public and could lead to Fansler being removed from the caucus and losing committee assignments.If Fansler doesn’t resign, he could be expelled from the House by a two-thirds vote – or 27 of 40 — of House members.The House Rules Committee also is meeting tonight. That committee would be responsible for starting the process of expelling Fansler.Spohnholz said Fansler’s position in the House shouldn’t wait for the resolution of a potential legal case.“It’s clear that Representative Fansler stepped over a line,” Spohnholz said. “Whether the court of law convicts him of that is a separate matter.”Anchorage Republican Rep. Charisse Millett said she expects Fansler to “do the right thing” and resign.“We have got to stop tolerating this behavior,” Millett said. “We have got to stop sweeping it under the rug. And we have got to honor the victims and their bravery coming forward.”House members said they believe Fansler is still in Juneau.It’s not clear when or if he will visit the Capitol again.
Carlos Ortiz underwent tests last year at Mary Washington Hospital in Fredericksburg, Va., for dizziness that later was linked to an inner-ear problem. When the uninsured gardener couldn’t pay his bill of about $15,000, the nonprofit institution took him to court. Mary Washington Hospital and others in Virginia were suing so many other patients that day that Fredericksburg Circuit Court had cleared the docket to hear all the cases. The patients “were coming one by one in front of the judge,” said Mr. Ortiz, 65, of Locust Grove, Va. “It was sad to see how many people were going through this.” (Armour, 6/25) The Same Hospitals That Enjoy Tax-Exempt Status Hound Low-Income Patients With Aggressive Collection Efforts A new study finds that while not every hospital sues over unpaid bills, a few sue a lot. “Hospitals were built — mostly by churches — to be a safe haven for people regardless of one’s race, creed or ability to pay. Hospitals have a nonprofit status — most of them — for a reason,” says Martin Makary, one of the JAMA study’s authors and a surgeon and researcher at Johns Hopkins Medicine. “They’re supposed to be community institutions.” This is part of the KHN Morning Briefing, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription. The Fredericksburg General District Court is a red-brick courthouse with Greek columns in a picturesque, Colonial Virginia town. A horse and carriage are usually parked outside the visitor center down the street. On a sunny morning — the second Friday in June — the first defendant at court is a young woman, Daisha Smith, 24, who arrives early; she has just come off working an overnight shift at a group home for the elderly. (Simmons-Duffin, 6/25) NPR: Hospitals Earn Little From Suing For Unpaid Bills. For Patients, It Can Be ‘Ruinous’ The Wall Street Journal: When Patients Can’t Pay, Many Hospitals Are Suing Hospital and insurer trade groups have allied to bash President Donald Trump’s latest executive order on rate disclosures. The groups and consumer advocates are closely watching how far HHS will decide to go with its price transparency requirements, since the order itself left the details vague. In the executive order signed Monday, Trump gave the agency 60 days to write the hospital requirements on publishing “standard charge information, including charges and information based on negotiated rates and for common or shoppable items.” (Luthi and Bannow, 6/25) Modern Healthcare: HHS Takes Price Transparency Reins After Trump Executive Order In other news on health care costs —